About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


61 Hung. J. Legal Stud. 1 (2020)

handle is hein.journals/ajur61 and id is 1 raw text is: Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies 61 (2020) 1, 1-22 DOI: 10.1556/2052.2020.00306 AKADM 1I KLADO The use of comparative law in the practice of the Hungarian Constitutional Court: An empirical analysis (1990-2019) ESZTER BODNAR* Premium postdoctoral scholar, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, ELTE Eotvos Lorind University, Hungary ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Received: October 7, 2020 Accepted: November 27, 2020 Published online: June 8, 2021 © 2021 The Author(s) ABSTRACT Courts conducting constitutional review do not work as 'ivory towers' any longer: they are part of the global dialogue on constitutional ideas and thoughts. This dialogue includes an exchange of experiences with fellow constitutional and apex courts, as well as the close observation of developments in foreign consti- tutional and legal systems, scholarship, and international trends. The Constitutional Court of Hungary has been an active participant in this dialogue since the Court's establishment in 1989, albeit with varying levels of intensity and goals. Moving beyond the often anecdotal observations in this field, the paper aims to conduct a deep analysis of how the Court uses comparative law in its work (during the preparatory phase and the drafting of final decisions) and examines the factors that may influence the Court's practice in this area. Such a clear overview can assist proponents of the use of comparative reasoning to contravene the increasing amount of criticism of the practice's legitimacy and selectivity. KEYWORDS constitutional courts, comparative law, international judicial dialogue Corresponding author. E-mail: eszter.bodnar@ajk.elte.hu