About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



48 Austl. Feminist L.J. 1 (2022)

handle is hein.journals/afemlj48 and id is 1 raw text is: 


AUSTRALIAN FEMINIST LAW JOURNAL                                   R   td
2022, VOL. 48, NO. 1, 1-9                        dJ           I)Routledge
https://doi.org/1 0.1080/13200968.2022.2138181                    Taylor&FrancisGroup



introduction: Conceptualisations of Violence

Sayomi   Ariyawansa',  Anjalee  de Silvab and  Balawyn   Jonesc

'Melbourne Law School, Melbourne, Australia; bARC Centre of Excellence for Automated
Decision-Making and Society, Melbourne Law School, Melbourne, Australia; cLa Trobe Law
School, Melbourne, Australia


Feminist  legal scholarship  has long  been  concerned   with  the subject  of
violence. In fact, some of the  core contributions  of feminist legal scholar-
ship in Australia and  worldwide have been to identify and examine the
specific forms  of  violence  faced  by  women - and critically, to move
beyond   perceptions  of such  violence as being  comprised   of discrete and
private acts  between   individuals to illuminate  its structural impacts and
causes.' However,   prevailing scholarly and legal conceptualisations  of 'vio-
lence' continually frame  it as a phenomenon that is predominately direct
and  physical. There is a need to challenge and  expand   on these conceptu-
alisations of violence. This special issue seeks to fulfil this aim by drawing
together  feminist scholarship  relating to structural violence and women's
lived experiences  of violence, as well as philosophical  and phenomenolo-
gical accounts  which   challenge  established  and  widely accepted   under-
standings  of violence.
   Our  call for papers was launched  during  the COVID-19   pandemic,  when
important  questions were  being  raised concerning the treatment  of margin-
alised members of our community, and during the growing backlash to
movements such as #MeToo which saw an upswing of what has been
called 'an asphyxiating  vortex of litigation'.2 We saw a need  to complicate
the  notion  of 'violence' as  being  direct and  predominantly physical in



_CNTACT  Balawyn Jones  balawyn.jones@latrobe.edu.au
'See, for example, Shazia Choudhry, 'Towards a Transformative Conceptualisation of Violence Against
Women   - A Critical Frame Analysis of Council of Europe Discourse on Violence Against Women'
  (2016) 79 Modern Law Review 406; Donna Chung, 'Questioning Domestic Violence Orthodoxies: Chal-
  lenging the Social Construction of Women as Victims and as Being Responsible for Stopping Male Vio-
  lence' (2002) 11 Women Against Violence: An Australian Feminist Journal 7; Mala Htun and Francesca
  Jensenius, 'Fighting Violence Against Women: Laws, Norms & Challenges Ahead' (2020) 149 Daedalus
  144; Rashida Manjoo and Daniela Nadj, 'Bridging the Divide: An Interview with Professor Rashida
  Manjoo, UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women' (2015) 23 Feminist Legal Studies 329
  and Kelly Weisberg (ed), Applications of Feminist Legal Theory (Temple University Press 1996).
2Richard Ackland, '#MeToo has led to an asphyxiating vortex of litigation' The Guardian (online, 3 April
2018)  <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/03/metoo-has-led-to-an-asphyxiating-
vortex-of-litigation>.
0 2022 Australian Feminist Law Journal Inc.