About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



38 American J. Crim. Just. 1 (2013)

handle is hein.journals/acnjrlocm38 and id is 1 raw text is: 

Am  J Crim Just (2013) 38:1-12
DOI 10.1007/s12103-012-9162-6




Race and Juvenile Incarceration: A Propensity Score
Matching Examination


George  E. Higgins • Melissa L. Ricketts•
James  D. Griffith • Stephanie A. Jirard



Received: 4 January 2012 /Accepted: 1 March 2012 /
Published online: 16 March 2012
©  Southern Criminal Justice Association 2012


Abstract  Disproportionate minority contact is an important issue in contemporary
juvenile justice. Few studies have directly examined  the link between  race and
judicial decision to incarceration. Using  official data from Pennsylvania   (n=
41,561), this study added to this literature in two ways. This study used propensity
score matching to obtain a purer estimate of the influence race has on the decision to
petition a case to juvenile court. The results indicated that prosecutors use perceptual
shorthand in making this decision that hinges on race. Specifically, blacks were more
1.28 times more likely than whites to have their case petitioned to juvenile court.

Keywords Disproportionate   minority contact - Propensity score matching . Race-
Incarceration


Conflict theorists have noted that blacks are more likely than whites to be subjected to
harsher punishments (Blalock, 1967; Chambliss, 1995; Quinney, 1970). The theorists
argued that blacks are subjected to harsher punishments for two reasons: 1) they are
powerless without any control over the social control agents, and 2) they are a threat
to the majority group. This would imply that race has some influence over decision-
making. Yet, research in this area has been mixed making it unclear if or how race has
any influence (Peterson & Hagan,  1984; Leiber, 2003). Researchers have performed
studies of the demographic  characteristics, circumstances, and elements of a court
case to clarify these mixed results (Kempf-Leonard & Sample, 2001; Leiber & Mack,
2005). An  important  issue in this process has been the perceptions of important
decision-makers  and the role that race plays when  a decision needs to be made
(Steffensmeier, 1980).

G. E. Higgins (E)
Department of Justice Administration, University of Louisville,
2301 South Third Street 208 Brigman Hall, Louisville, KY, USA
e-mail: gehiggOl@louisville.edu

M. L. Ricketts - J. D. Griffith - S. A. Jirard
Shippensburg University, Shippensburg, PA, USA


4L Springer