About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



31 American J. Crim. Just. 1 (2006-2007)

handle is hein.journals/acnjrlocm31 and id is 1 raw text is: 






       LAW ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION
          SHARING: A Florida Case Study

                 K. MICHAEL REYNOLDS, Ph.D.
                     University of Central Florida

                   PAMALA L. GRISET, Ph.D.t
                     University of Central Florida

                     ERNEST SCOTT, JR., M.A.
                     Orange County  Sheriff's Office

    ABSTRACT:  Many  attempts have been made over the last several decades to
    improve communication among law enforcement agencies. This article is a case
    study of a low-level data sharing project in Florida that could serve as a na-
    tional model. The Florida Law Enforcement Data Sharing Consortium is a part-
    nership between the University of Central Florida and more than one hundred law
    enforcement agencies. It offers an inexpensive, yet technically advanced alterna-
    tive to the proprietary data sharing model. Its distributed architecture was en-
    dorsed by the Markle Foundation, the 9/11 Commission, and the 2004 National
    Security Act. Civil liberties concerns raised by this and other types of data sharing
    projects are discussed.


                         INTRODUCTION
     In 1953, when Supreme  Court  Justice Robert H. Jackson asked  the
American   Bar Association  (ABA)  to conduct  a thorough  study of the
criminal justice system, the prevailing wisdom oversimplified policing.
Three  years later, the ABA's Survey of the Administration of Criminal
Justice began the first systematic field observations of criminal justice
officials at work. Rather than seeing police as simply politically influ-
enced, corrupt, or untrained and  under funded,  the ABA   researchers,
led by Frank Remington,   stressed that police departments were admin-
istrative, bureaucratic agencies exercising enormous discretion (Walker,
1993). The  discretionary decisions of each official influenced, and were
influenced by, discretionary decisions of officials in other agencies. Yet,
there was  little coordination and interaction among agencies  within a

     f Direct all correspondence to: Pamala Griset, University of Central Florida, De-
partment of Criminal Justice and Legal Studies, P.O. Box 161600, Orlando, Florida 32816.
Email: griset@mail.ucf edu.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Vol. 31 No. 1, 2006
© 2006 Southern Criminal Justice Association