About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



22 American J. Crim. Just. 1 (1997-1998)

handle is hein.journals/acnjrlocm22 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                THE NEW CHAIN GANG:
           Corrections in the Next Century

                        HARRY E. ALLENt
                      San  Jose State  University

                          JULIE   C. ABRIL
                      San  Jose State  University

   ABSTRACT:   This article examines the operations and excesses of the correc-
   tional chain gang as a group of prisoners working outside a penal facility under
   armed correctional supervision and wearing chains or other restraining devices to
   prevent escape. We detail the operations and excesses of earlier chain gangs, iden-
   tifying variables that contributed to the contemporary phase that emerged in 1995.
   Predicated on vengeance, retributive justice, and punitiveness, the chain gang rep-
   resents yet another devolving standard of human decency in correctional policies.
   Future scenarios are explored.


                         INTRODUCTION
    Few  correctional programs  are as controversial as the re-emerging
chain gang, currently attacked on a variety of issues including recidi-
vism, cruel and unusual  punishment  (Glazer, 1996), cost-effectiveness,
deterrence, and racism (Lichtenstein, 1993). Proponents  advance  laud-
able correctional goals: constructive work for otherwise  idle inmates,
cost avoidance, easing prison management   problems, sending deterrent
messages, and  providing punishment  as a moral obligation. Opponents
cite the emerging  standards  of human   decency, Eighth  Amendment
protections, the use of chain gangs as punishment   without redeeming
correctional objectives, debasing and humiliating  practices, and chain
gang  use for scurrilous political purposes by unscrupulous  politicians
(Editors, Harvard  Law   Review,  1996). The  debate  will undoubtedly
continue  and may  accelerate.
     In an effort to identify and clarify the issues surrounding this cor-
rectional practice, we offer a historical overview and analysis of the two
phases  of use of the chain gang:  the 1900-1940  Progressive  era to
which  much  of the negative commentary   will be traced, and the post-
1995  era that began with chain gang reintroduction in Alabama.   Also

     t Direct all correspondence to: Harry E. Allen, Administration of Justice Depart-
ment, San Jose State University, One Washington Square, San Jose, CA 95192-0050.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Vol. 22 No. 1, 1997
© 1997 Southern Criminal Justice Association