About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



14 American J. Crim. Just. 1 (1989-1990)

handle is hein.journals/acnjrlocm14 and id is 1 raw text is: 


AJCJ, Vol XIV, No. 1, (1989)


      TRENDS IN JAIL ADMISSIONS RATES

                       Rosemary L. Gido


                           ABSTRACT

     Historical data on national and  state jail admissions trends
have  not been  fully explored for theoretical and empirical insights
into what  causes  jail populations to vary over time. This study
draws  on   New  York  State  historical jail records, research on
national and state imprisonment trends, and macro perspectives on
crime control and punishment.   The analysis explores some  of the
possible causal  relationships between variation in jail admissions
and  unemployment,  major demographic  trends, war, depression, jail
capacity, and law enforcement  and  judicial practices. Theoretical,
methodological, and  operational implications of the research are
discussed.

INTRODUCTION

     National statistics indicate that crowding continues to be the
major  issue confronting local jails across the country (Bureau of
Justice Statistics, 1987). As the spillover from record state prison
population growth confounds  efforts to alleviate the problem, there
is a new  focus of interest by researchers and policy makers alike
on   the   legal, operational, and   administrative problems   of
contemporary  jails (Mays and Thompson,  1988; National Institute of
Justice, 1988; Thompson, 1986).

     Yet, the current jail population crisis is by no means a new
phenomenon. Periods of acute jail  population growth have marked
the history of this stepchild of the criminal justice system over
the last 150 years. The ebb and  flow of population, crime waves,
penal reform and  punishment sentiment are among  the factors that
have  affected the size and composition of the offender population
of local jails over time.

     Between   1830  and  1860, social reform movements in this
country  spawned   institutions for orphans, poor and  delinquent
children (houses of refuge) and  mental asylums,  removing  whole
classes of offenders from local jails (Wayson et al., 1977).


1