About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



1 The Lansing-Ishii Agreement: Message from the President of the United States 1 (1922)

handle is hein.hoil/lsgisiam0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

67TH CONGRESS, j           SENATE.                   DOCUMENT
  2d Session.  5                                      No. 150.





             THE  LANSING-ISHII AGREEMENT.



                       MESSAGE
                           FROM THE

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,
                          TRANSMITTING

IN RESPONSE  TO A SENATE  RESQLUTION   OF FEBRUARY   23 (CALEN-
  DAR  DAY, MARCH   6), 1922, INFORMATION  AS TO TH:  PRESENT
  STATUS  AND  BINDING   EFFECT  OF  THE  SO-CALLED   LANSING-
  ISHII AGREEMENT,   SIGNED NOVEMBER 2,   1917.


MARCH 7 (calendar day, MARCH 8), 1922.-Read; ordered to lie on the table and to be
                            printed.


To  the SENATE:
  I have received the resolution (S. Res. 251) requesting me, if not
incompatible with the public interest-
to advise the Senate as to the present status and binding effect of what is known as
the Lansing-Ishii agreement between the United States and the Empire of Japan.
  Secondly, as to whether or not the four-power pact, now before the Senate for con-
sideration, if ratified, will abrogate, nullify, or in any way modify such agreement;
and as to what will be the status of said agreement after the ratification of said four-
power pact.
  The  so-called Lansing-Ishii agreement, signed November 2, 1917,
was  not a treaty, but was an exchange of notes between the Secre-
tary of State of the United States and Viscount Ishii, ambassador
extraordinary and plenipotentiary of Japan on special mission. It
was  described in the notes themselves as a public announcement of
the desires and intentions shared by the two Governments with re-
gard to China.  This exchange of notes, in the nature of things, did
not constitute anything more than a declaration of Executive policy.
It is hardly necessary to point out that such a declaration, or ex-
change of notes, could not have any effect whatever inconsistent with
treaty obligations whether existing or thereafter coming into force..