About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


B-419657.3 Sep 30, 2021 1 (2021-09-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaooji0001 and id is 1 raw text is: US. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE This decision issued on the date below was subject to a GAO D ecis io n Protective Order and contained classified information. This version has been approved for public release. Redactions obscured by black boxes remove classified information per the -contracting _ag en cy. Matter of: Department of the Air Force--Reconsideration File: B-419657.3 Date: September 30, 2021 Jason A. Carey, Esq., and J. Hunter Bennet, Esq. Covington & Burling, LLP, for the protester. Marcia G. Madsen, Esq., and Luke Levasseur, Esq., Mayer Brown LLP, and Noah Bleicher, Esq., Jenner Block, LLP, for the intervenor. Major David S. Gilkes, Jason R. Smith, Esq., and Summer Browning, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency. Michael Willems, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Request for reconsideration of prior decision is denied because the request repeats arguments already made in the original protest, relies on arguments and information that could have been, but were not, presented during the initial protest, and does not demonstrate that our decision contained errors of fact as alleged in the request. DECISION The Department of the Air Force requests reconsideration of our decision ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc., B-419657, et al., June 17, 2021 (unpublished decision), in which we sustained ManTech's protest against the award of an indefinite- delivery, indefinite-quantity contract and issuance of associated task orders to General Dynamics One Source (GDOS), LLC, under request for proposals No. FA8240-19-R- 350, issued by the Air Force for security support services. The Air Force contends that our earlier decision contains errors of fact that warrant reconsideration of our decision. We deny the request for reconsideration. BACKGROUND ManTech filed a protest and several supplemental protests with our Office alleging the award to GDOS was improper because, among other things, GDOS proposed to