About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


B-418266.11,B-418266.13,B-418266.9 Mar 03, 2022 1 (2022-03-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaomwo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAiOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to D e s / ' +'a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Matter of: American Roll-On Roll-Off Carrier Group, Inc. File: B-418266.9; B-418266.11; B-418266.13 Date: March 3, 2022 Kara M. Sacilotto, Esq., Brian G. Walsh, Esq., Tracye Winfrey Howard, Esq., Gary S. Ward, Esq., J. Ryan Frazee, Esq., Cara L. Lasley, Esq., Adam R. Briscoe, Esq., and Jennifer Eve Retener, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for the protester. Craig A. Holman, Esq., Stuart W. Turner, Esq., Sonia Tabriz, Esq., Amanda J. Sherwood, Esq., Thomas A. Pettit, Esq., Trevor Schmitt, Esq., Aime JH Joo, Esq., and Nicole Williamson, Esq., Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, for HomeSafe Alliance LLC, the intervenor. Colonel Frank Yoon, Lieutenant Colonel Mathew Ramage-White, Aaron J. Weaver, Esq., Bradley E. Richardson, Esq., Todd P. Federici, Esq., Adam J. Koudelka, Esq., Willie J. McAlister, Esq., and Peter B. Ries, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency. Kenneth Kilgour, Esq., and Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest challenging contracting officer's affirmative responsibility determination is denied where the protester's allegations do not establish that the contracting officer failed to consider available relevant information when making the responsibility determination. 2. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of offerors' technical proposals is denied where the agency's evaluation was reasonable and in accordance with the solicitation. 3. Protest that the agency performed an unreasonable price reasonableness evaluation is denied where the price reasonableness evaluation was consistent with the solicitation and the Federal Acquisition Regulation. 4. Protest challenging the agency's best-value tradeoff analysis is denied where the record reflects the agency's source selection rationale was documented and consistent with the stated evaluation criteria.