About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-420201 Dec 27, 2021 1 (2021-12-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaomol0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 1Oo_      U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
A Century of Non-Partisan Fact-Based Work
441 G St. N.W.                                       Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                 of the United States
Decision
Matter of: Allosense, Inc.
File:     B-420201
Date:     December 27, 2021
Roman Sandoval for the protester.
Colonel Frank Yoon, Major Thomas F. Pfeifer, Major Brian M. Shust, and Robert E.
Beyler, Esq., Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
Christopher Alwood, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST
1. Protest challenging agency's decision not to meet its requirement through the award
of a sole-source small business innovation research (SBIR) phase III award is
dismissed as untimely where the protester did not protest the terms of the request for
quotations that sought to meet the requirement on a competitive basis outside the SBIR
program until after the closing date for receipt of quotations.
2. Protest challenging the agency's decision not to consider a vendor's quotation is
dismissed for lack of interested-party status where the protester's quotation, even if it
were considered by the agency, would not be next in line for award, given the
solicitation's lowest price, technically acceptable basis for award.
DECISION
Allosense, Inc., a small business of San Antonio, Texas, protests the award of a
contract to Apptricity Corporation, a small business of Irving, Texas, under request for
quotations (RFQ) No. F1 M2X51194A001, issued by the Department of the Air Force,
628th Contracting Squadron for a telematics tracking system for the tracking of
aerospace ground equipment. The protester contends that the agency should have met
its requirement through a small business innovation research (SBIR) phase III sole-
source contract or, alternatively, should have considered Allosense's quotation
requesting an SBIR phase III award on a sole-source basis for award under the RFQ.

We dismiss the protest.