About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-299557 1 (2007-05-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaufn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                  Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: A-TEK, Inc.

          File:        B-299557

          Date:        May 3, 2007

          Debbie Rieger for the protester.
          Jonathan R. Celniker, Esq., and Michael J. Ettner, Esq., General Services
          Administration, for the agency.
          Paul E. Jordan, Esq., and John M. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
          participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          In procurement that will include cost-reimbursement task orders, agency reasonably
          rejected protester's proposal for lack of verification of federally audited accounting
          system as required by the solicitation.
          DECISION

          A-TEK, Inc. protests the rejection of its proposal as unacceptable, based on a
          requirement concerning the adequacy of the firm's accounting system, under request
          for proposals (RFP) No. TQ2006MCB0001, issued by the General Services
          Administration (GSA) for information technology (IT) services. A-TEK primarily
          asserts that the rejection is unreasonable because it furnished sufficient information
          to satisfy the requirement and, in any event, GSA is responsible for A-TEK's failure to
          meet the requirement.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP anticipated the award of some 25 to 30 contracts under a multiple-award,
          indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (ID/IQ) government-wide acquisition contract
          (GWAC) for a broad range of IT services, with a not-to-exceed ceiling of $50 billion.
          Contractors were to provide all management, supervision, labor, facilities and
          materials necessary to perform on a task order basis, including cost-reimbursement
          orders. Awards were to be made on a best value basis, with proposals evaluated
          under two equally important technical factors--past performance and contract plan--
          which, combined, were significantly more important than price. Prior to the