About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-298281.2 1 (2006-10-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaspv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




A         G    A    O                                                  Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                       of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office         DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                      GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                      approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter of: Bannum, Inc.

          File:        B-298281.2

          Date:        October 16, 2006

          Michael A. Gordon, Esq., and Fran Baskin, Esq., Holmes & Gordon, for the protester.
          Alex D. Tomaszczuk, Esq., Daniel S. Herzfeld, Esq., and Orest J. Jowyk, Esq.,
          Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, for Dismas Charities, Inc., the intervenor.
          Tracey L. Printer, Esq., Federal Bureau of Prisons, for the agency.
          Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
          General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Where solicitation provided for award on the basis of initial proposals to the offeror
          whose proposal was determined to be in the best interests of the government,
          agency properly awarded contract without discussions where record shows that
          discussions were not necessary to determine which proposal represented the best
          value to the government.
          DECISION

          Bannum, Inc. protests the award of a contract to Dismas Charities, Inc. under
          request for proposals (RFP) No. 200-0800-SE, issued by the Department of Justice,
          Federal Bureau of Prisons for community corrections center (CCC) services for
          federal offenders in the Orlando, Florida area. Bannum contends that the agency
          improperly awarded to Dismas on the basis of initial proposals.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP, which was issued on November 30, 2005, contemplated the award of an
          indefinite-delivery requirements contracts for a 3-year base period and seven 1-year
          award terms.' The solicitation provided for award to the offeror whose proposal was


          1 The award term concept is intended as an incentive to the contractor that permits
          extensions to the base contract period based on the contractor's performance. RFP
          § 1.11.