About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-294359 1 (2004-11-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptapoi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G     A    0                                                 Comptroller General
             SIntegrity Reliability                                   of the United States
 ~ccountabthty Inert Rea iy
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: American Guard Services, Inc.

          File:       B-294359

          Date:       November 1, 2004

          Sherif Assal for the protester.
          G. Thomas Carter, Esq., Department of Homeland Security, for the agency.
          Katherine I. Riback, Esq., and Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest complaining that the protester's past performance should have received
          higher than an acceptable rating and that the awardee's acceptable past performance
          rating was unreasonable is denied where the solicitation only provided for a pass/fail
          evaluation of past performance and the record supports the agency's judgment that
          both firms had acceptable past performance.
          DECISION

          American Guard Services, Inc. (AGS) protests the award of a blanket purchase
          agreement (BPA) by the Department of Homeland Security to Securitas Security
          Guard Services, Inc., under that firm's Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contract,
          pursuant to request for quotations (RFQ) No. HS-FPS-04-XPC-0014 for guard services
          in federal buildings in Alaska. AGS challenges the evaluation of its and the
          awardee's past performance.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFQ, issued on April 20, 2004, provided for the award of a BPA for a two-month
          base period and four option years. A detailed statement of work was provided that
          described the services to be provided, and the solicitation identified estimated total
          labor hours for regular armed guard services and supervisory services. Vendors
          were required to provide fixed-hourly-labor rates based upon these estimates.!

          'The RFQ required that the vendors' quoted fixed-hourly-rates include all direct and
          indirect costs and profit. RFQ at 8.