About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-288161 1 (2002-04-08)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaoba0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          GAO
,Accountability * Integrity * Reliability
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548




          B-288161




          April 8, 2002

          Mr. James M. Eagen, III
          Chief Administrative Officer
          Office of the Chief Administrative Officer
          House of Representatives

          Subject: 911 Emergency Surcharge and Right-of-Way Charge

          Dear Mr. Eagen:

          By letter dated June 18, 2001, you asked whether the United States House of
          Representatives and its respective offices are responsible for paying the 911
          emergency surcharge and the right-of-way charge to local carriers within the District
          of Columbia. Both charges are itemized on the monthly statement from the local
          carrier, Verizon. As set forth more fully below, we find that the District of Columbia's
          911 emergency surcharge is a tax, the legal incidence of which falls directly on the
          federal government as a user of telephone services in the District of Columbia.
          Consequently, the United States is constitutionally immune and the tax is not payable
          by the federal government. However, the right-of-way charge is a rental fee imposed
          upon the telecommunications companies and other utilities that use public property.
          Since it is not a tax that falls on the federal government as a vendee, the federal
          government may pay the right-of-way charge.

          Background

          The House of Representatives receives a monthly statement from Verizon, its local
          carrier for telephone services. Among the itemized charges are two specific fees
          which are the subject of your letter: a 911 emergency surcharge and a right-of-way
          charge. You note that the federal government is constitutionally immune from
          taxation by the states and where a state tax is imposed directly on the purchaser, and
          the purchaser is the United States, the United States is not required to pay the tax
          pursuant to principles of sovereign immunity. McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S.
          (4 Wheat.) 316 (1819). You asked us whether the House of Representatives and its