About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-280980 1 (1998-12-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptahxm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548
Decision




Matter of: Advanced Seal Technology, Inc.

File:        B-280980

Date:        December 14, 1998

James P. Rome, Esq., for the protester.
Walter R. Pierce, Esq., Defense Logistics Agency, for the agency.
C. Douglas McArthur, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest that agency failed to consider quotation allegedly sent by facsimile is denied
where the record does not show that the agency received the quotation.
DECISION

Advanced Seal Technology, Inc. (AST) protests the issuance of a purchase order
to Quality Control Corporation (QCC) under request for quotations (RFQ)
No. SP0760-98-Q-1478, issued by the Defense Logistics Agency for seal assemblies.
AST contends that it submitted the low-priced quotation in response to the
solicitation.

We deny the protest.

On July 7, 1998, the agency issued the RFQ for spring-loaded shaft seal assemblies,
with a list of three approved sources and their corresponding part numbers. A
synopsis prepared for the Commerce Business Daily (CBD) identified the buyer,
with her telephone and facsimile numbers. The RFQ itself listed a different
facsimile number in the address box for the contracting activity, the Defense Supply
Center, Columbus (DSCC).

On September 2, the protester contacted the agency regarding the status of the
procurement and was told that DSCC intended to issue a purchase order to QCC at
a price of $950 per unit. The protester asked the agency what had happened to its
quotation, which, it asserted, was lower in price. After a review of the file, the