About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-275784 1 (1997-03-27)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptafvn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548
Decision




Matter of: American Medical Professionals, Inc.

File:        B-275784

Date:        March 27, 1997

Sam Zalman Gdanski, Esq., for the protester.
James S. Ganther, Esq., for Seaborn Healthcare Services, an intervenor.
John R. Osing, Jr., Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
Tania L. Calhoun, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Allegation that contracting agency improperly misled protester into raising its
pricing over the course of the procurement is denied where the record shows that
the protester was only asked to verify the pricing it had previously proposed;
protester's determination to ignore that request and to instead raise its pricing in
response reflects its own business judgment and no impropriety on the agency's
part.
DECISION

American Medical Professionals, Inc. (AMP) protests the award of a contract to
Seaborn Healthcare Services under request for proposals (RFP) No. N62645-96-R-
0003, issued by the Department of the Navy, Naval Medical Logistics Command, for
ultrasound technician services at the Naval Medical Center in Portsmouth, Virginia.
AMP chiefly argues that the Navy conducted inadequate discussions with the firm.

We deny the protest.

The solicitation anticipated the award of a fixed-price contract for the provision of
these services by two ultrasound technicians over 1 base year, with up to 5 option
years. The technicians are required to perform their duties for 40 hours per week
during normal business hours. In addition, one technician is required to provide on-
call services, on an as-needed basis, from the end of a given workday through the
next morning. Award would be made to the offeror submitting the lowest-priced,
technically acceptable offer.1


1Technical acceptability, not at issue here, would be determined based upon the
documented professional and technical experience of the offered technicians.


319210