About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-270860.5 1 (1996-07-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaocrptaebm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


Comptroller General
of the United States
Washington, D.C. 20548

Decision



Matter of: Department of the Army--Reconsideration

File:        B-270860.5

Date:        July 18, 1996

James H. Roberts III, Esq., Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, for Holiday Inn-Laurel.
J. William Bennett, Esq., for Convention Marketing Services, Inc.
Col. Nicholas P. Retson and Capt. Bryant S. Banes, Department of the Army, for the
agency.
Tania L. Calhoun, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Request for reconsideration is denied where the requesting party has not shown
that our prior decision contained legal or factual errors which would warrant a
reversal or modification of our decision.
DECISION

The Department of the Army requests that we reconsider our decision in Holiday
Inn-Laurel--Protest and Request for Costs, B-270860.3; B-270860.4, May 30, 1996, 96-1
CPD    259, concerning the Army's procurement of meals, lodging, and
transportation to support the Baltimore Military Entrance and Processing Station in
Baltimore, Maryland under request for proposals (RFP) No. DAHC36-95-R-0012. In
that decision, we granted Holiday Inn-Laurel's request that it be reimbursed the
reasonable costs of filing and pursuing its protest of the evaluation of its proposal,
and sustained its protest of the Army's refusal to award it the contract in light of
the fact that the Small Business Administration (SBA) issued the firm a certificate
of competency (COC).

We deny the request for reconsideration.

Holiday Inn-Laurel filed a protest' in which it asserted that the Army had improperly
evaluated its proposal as marginal and, more specifically, that the Army had
improperly evaluated its proposal with respect to past performance. The firm also
challenged the Army's past performance evaluation to the extent that it constituted


1The long history of this disputed procurement is set forth in detail in our May 30
decision and will not be repeated here.


1243718