About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-419046.2,B-419046.3,B-419046.4 1 (2021-01-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaecmv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                     1O    o    U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
                                A Century of Non-Partisan Fact-Based Work
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States

                                             DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                           been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Appsential, LLC

File:     B-419046.2; B-419046.3; B-419046.4

Date:     January 22,   2021

Eric S. Crusius, Esq., David S. Black, Esq., Gregory R. Hallmark, Esq., and Kelsey M.
Hayes, Esq., Holland & Knight LLP, for the protester.
Carla J. Weiss, Esq., Noah B. Bleicher, Esq., and Umer M. Chaudhry, Esq., Jenner &
Block, LLP, for General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., the intervenor.
Stephanie B. Young, Esq., Kevin R. Hilferty, Esq., and Stephanie Villalta, Esq.,
Department  of Energy, for the agency.
Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Agency's evaluation of protester's and awardee's quotations under the price and
non-price evaluation factors was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the
solicitation and applicable statutes and regulations.

2. Agency's evaluation of the prices submitted in protester's and awardee's quotations,
including the agency's consideration of labor mix and level of effort associated with
each, was reasonable and consistent with the terms of the solicitation and applicable
statutes and regulations.

3. In performing the best-value tradeoff determination, the source selection official
considered and compared  the competing quotations and reasonably concluded that the
potential benefits of protester's higher-rated quotation did not warrant the associated
price premium.
DECISION

Appsential, LLC, of Germantown, Maryland, protests the Department of Energy's (DOE)
establishment of a blanket purchase agreement (BPA) and issuance of initial task
orders to General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. (GDIT), pursuant to
solicitation No. 89303019QCF000008  and request for quotations (RFQ) No. 1395153,
to operate and maintain certain business systems for DOE. Appsential, the incumbent
contractor, challenges the agency's evaluation of Appsential's and/or GDIT's quotation
under each evaluation factor, and also challenges the agency's best-value tradeoff