About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-419141,B-419141.2,B-419141.3 1 (2020-12-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaechy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                  Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States

                                            DOCUMENT   FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                  a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          been approved for public release.


Matter of:  Amaze  Technologies, LLC

File:     B-419141; B-419141.2;   B-419141.3

Date:     December 22, 2020

Matthew  P. Moriarty, Esq., and Ian P. Patterson, Esq., Schoonover & Moriarty LLC, for
the protester.
William M. Jack, Esq., Amba M. Datta, Esq., and Ken M. Kanzawa, Esq., Kelley Drye &
Warren  LLP, for Apogee Engineering, LLC, the intervenor.
Colonel Patricia S. Wiegman-Lenz, Major Matthew W. Ramage-White, and Captain
David J. Ely, Department of the Air Force, for the agency.
John Sorrenti, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest that agency unreasonably deducted points from protester's proposed score is
denied where record supports the agency's finding that the protester failed to
substantiate a number of points that it claimed in its proposed score.
DECISION

Amaze  Technologies, LLC, of Herndon, Virginia, protests the issuance of a task order to
Apogee  Engineering, LLC, of Colorado Springs, Colorado by the Department of the Air
Force under fair opportunity proposal request (FOPR) No. 59 for advisory and
assistance support services for the Air Force life cycle management center. Amaze
argues that the agency ignored information in Amaze's proposal and departed from the
stated evaluation criteria when it deducted points from Amaze's proposed score.

We  deny the protest.

BACKGROUND

The FOPR  was  issued to holders of the General Services Administration's One
Acquisition Solution for Integrated Services (OASIS) small business multiple award,
indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts. Agency Report (AR), Tab 19,