About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-417846.4,B-417846.5 1 (2020-04-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaebak0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                   Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                              of the United States
                                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                           The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                   a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          1been approved for public release.


Matter of:   Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.

File:        B-417846.4; B-417846.5

Date:        April 23, 2020

Michael D. McGill, Esq., and Thomas A. Pettit, Esq., Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer,
LLP, for the protester.
John E. McCarthy, Jr., Esq., Sarah A. Hill, Esq., and Christopher D. Garcia, Esq.,
Crowell & Moring LLP, for Heritage Reporting Corp., the intervenor.
Charles S. Pino, Esq., and Gina K. Grippando, Esq., United States International Trade
Commission, for the agency.
Andrew J. Smith, Esq., and Evan C. Williams, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

1. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation under the technical factor is denied
where the agency's evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation.

2. Protest alleging that the awardee would not comply with transcript formatting
requirement is dismissed, where the allegation involves matters of contract
administration and there is no significant countervailing evidence reasonably known to
the agency evaluators that should create doubt whether the vendor will or can comply
with the requirement.

3. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of past performance is denied, where
the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the solicitation, and there is no
evidence that the evaluators ignored adverse information about which they should have
been aware.

4. Protest alleging that the awardee's quotation violated the solicitation's subcontracting
limitation clause is denied where the awardee's quotation did not indicate that the
awardee took exception to the limitation.
DECISION

Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc., a small business of Washington, District of Columbia,
protests the award of a contract to Heritage Reporting Corp., also a small business of