About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-417803.2 1 (2019-10-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaeadq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                           of the United States




Decision


Matter of: AeroSage, LLC--Costs

File:       B-417803.2

Date:       October 29, 2019

David M. Snyder, AeroSage, LLC, for the protester.
Benjamin Ratichek, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
John Sorrenti, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Request for recommendation of reimbursement of protest and bid preparation costs
following corrective action is denied where the record does not establish that the agency
unduly delayed taking corrective action when it announced its decision to take
corrective action by the time established for the submission of the agency's report.
DECISION

AeroSage, LLC, a service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) of
Tampa, Florida, requests that we recommend reimbursement of the reasonable costs of
filing and pursuing its protest of the terms of request for quotations (RFQ)
No. 36C78619Q0312, the evaluation of quotations, and the award of a contract to
Crystal Flash, Inc., of Grand Rapids, Michigan, by the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA), for diesel fuel and ethanol-free gasoline at Fort Custer National Cemetery
in Augusta, Michigan.' AeroSage also requests reimbursement for bid preparation
costs.


1 AeroSage refers to its protest as having been jointly filed with SageCare, Inc., and
argues that SageCare also is entitled to reimbursement. Our Office recognized, and
docketed, the protest as filed solely by AeroSage, LLC. SageCare submitted a
quotation in response to the RFQ, and filed a request to intervene in AeroSage's
protest. We denied this request because SageCare was not the awardee, and the
agency found SageCare's quotation technically non-responsive, and thus SageCare did
not show that it had a substantial chance of receiving an award if AeroSage's protest
was denied.