About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


B-417289.2 1 (2019-05-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadzgf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States Decision Matter of: AeroSage, LLC File: B-417289.2 Date: May 14, 2019 David M. Snyder, AeroSage, LLC, for the protester. Matthew Vasquez, Esq., and May Sena, Esq., Defense Logistics Agency, for the agency. Heather Self, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST 1. Protest that agency improperly cancelled a solicitation and resolicited the same fuel requirement to avoid making award to the protester is dismissed for failing to set forth a legally sufficient basis of protest where the protester's allegations are without factual support. 2. Protest challenging term in request for quotations requiring vendors to provide written acceptance of a government offer in two hours or less is denied where the term is reasonable in light of the short time between receipt of quotations and delivery. 3. Protest of an agency's failure to implement the statutorily required stay of award is dismissed because it is not a matter for consideration by GAO. DECISION AeroSage, LLC, a service-disabled veteran-owned small business of Tampa, Florida, protests the terms of request for quotations (RFQ) No. SPE605-19-Q-0256, issued by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) for diesel fuel. The protester argues the agency improperly issued RFQ No. SPE605-19-Q-0256 in lieu of making award to the protester under a prior solicitation' for the same fuel requirement. The protester also challenges 1 AeroSage also protests the agency's actions in making award under a prior RFQ it alleges was cancelled and resolicited--RFQ No. SPE605-19-Q-0253. AeroSage's challenge to the award under RFQ No. SPE605-19-Q-0253 was before our Office as a separate protest docketed as B-417289.1, which we denied in part and dismissed in (continued...)