About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



D18063 1 (2017-11-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtzh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 















Operation and
Maintenance,
Army (OMA)


October
27, 2016


September
-29,2012


31 U.S.C.
§ 1341
(a)(1)(A)


The Army, through
the Department of
Defense (DOD),
reported two
violations of the
Antideficiency Act
(ADA). The Army
reported that it
improperly
obligated funds
from its OMA
account to develop
a new software
system when it
should have
obligated funds
from its Research,
Development, Test,
and Evaluation
(RDTE) account.
The Army also
reported that it
reprogrammed
amounts that were
not legally available
for obligation.
Section 8076 of the
Department of
Defense
Appropriations Act,
2012, prohibits


The Army reported
that it was able to
adjust its accounts
from OMA to RDTE to
correct the improper
obligation for the
software system. The
Army reported that it
was unable to correct
the second violation.

The Army reported
that it identified four
responsible individuals
and determined that
these individuals
committed the
violations without
knowing or willful
intent to violate the
ADA. The Army
reported that three of
the individuals each
received a
Memorandum of
Counseling, while the
fourth individual was
not disciplined
because he/she is no
longer employed by
the government. To


GAO-,
17-01


Army
15-02


Department
of the Army
(Army)


Source: Unaudited information GAO extracted from agency Antideficiency Act reports; for further information about a specific report, please contact the relevant agency.
United States Government Accountability Office                                                                      Antideficiency Act Report Information, FY 2017
ww   ao  ov                                                                                                                                  Page 1 of 33