About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-414314.3 1 (2017-07-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtqa0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



G     A    O       U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                           of the United States




Decision


Matter of: AeroSage LLC--Reconsideration

File:       B-414314.3

Date:       July 24, 2017

David M. Snyder, for the protester.
Journey Beard, Esq., Defense Logistics Agency, for the agency.
Pedro E. Briones, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Request for reconsideration of prior decision is denied where the requesting party has
not shown that our decision contains either errors of fact or law or information not
previously considered, and where the requestor's disagreement with the scope of the
procuring agency's document release during the course of the protest does not meet
our standard for reversal or modification of the prior decision.
DECISION

AeroSage LLC requests that our Office reconsider our decision, AeroSacqe LLC,
B-414314, B-414314.2, May 5, 2017, 2017 CPD  137, in which we denied the protest
of the terms of request for quotations (RFQ) No. SPE600-17-P-2175, issued by the
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) on behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
for diesel fuel for the Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC) in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin.

We deny the request for reconsideration.

BACKGROUND

In our prior decision, we denied AeroSage's protest of DLA's decision not to set aside
the procurement for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSBs).
AeroSacqe LLC, supra. We found, based on our review of the record and the
circumstances of the procurement, that the contracting officer reasonably focused her
market research on prospective fuel vendors to Wisconsin given the urgency of the
requirement, and that she reasonably concluded that DLA did not have a reasonable
expectation of receiving quotations from two or more SDVOSBs capable of performing