About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-413652.2,B-413652.3,B-413652.4 1 (2017-07-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtoc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                 Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States




Decision


Matter of: A-T Solutions, Inc.

File:       B-413652.2; B-413652.3; B-413652.4

Date:       July 5, 2017

Anuj Vohra, Esq., Nooree Lee, Esq., and Evan R. Sherwood, Esq., Covington & Burling,
LLP, for the protester.
Joseph G. Billings, Esq., and Katherine B. Burrows, Esq., Miles & Stockbridge PC, for
American Systems Corporation, an intervenor.
Abigail Stokes, Esq., Wendy laci, Esq., T. DeShawn Davis, Esq., and Wayne Wright,
Esq., Department of the Navy, for the agency.
Scott H. Riback, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest alleging that agency unreasonably declined to reopen discussions where, after
submission of final proposal revisions, protester's proposal became technically
unacceptable because one of its key personnel became unavailable is denied; record
shows that agency engaged in two rounds of meaningful discussions and agency, in its
discretion, reasonably declined to reopen discussions to allow protester to revise its
proposal.
DECISION

A-T Solutions, Inc. (ATS), of Fredericksburg, Virginia, protests its elimination from
consideration for the issuance of a task order under request for proposals (RFP) No.
N00024-15-3584, issued by the Department of the Navy for operation and training
support services related to the analysis and management of identified and recovered
explosive hazards. ATS also protests the issuance of a task order for the services to
American Systems Corporation, of Chantilly, Virginia. ATS maintains that the Navy
unreasonably declined to reopen discussions after ATS advised it of the unavailability of
one of its proposed key personnel. ATS also maintains that American Systems failed to
keep the agency apprised as to the availability of its personnel.


We deny the protest in part and dismiss it in part.