About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-413861.4 1 (2017-06-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtob0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



GO U.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
441 G St. N.W.                                                 Comptroller General
Washington, DC 20548                                            of the United States
                                         .......................................................................................................................
                                            DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                          The decision issued on the date below was subject to
Decision                                  a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                          been approved for public release.


Matter of:  Aurotech, Inc.

File:       B-413861.4

Date:       June 23, 2017

Kenneth A. Martin, Esq., The Martin Law Firm, PLLC, for the protester.
Robert J. Symon, Esq., and Aron C. Beezley, Esq., Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP,
for the intervenor.
Anthony E. Marrone, Esq., Department of Health and Human Services, for the agency.
Pedro E. Briones, Esq., and Peter H. Tran, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO,
participated in the preparation of the decision.
DIGEST

Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of quotations and award of a blanket
purchase agreement and task order is denied where the record shows that the
evaluation and source selection decision were reasonable and consistent with the terms
of the solicitation.
DECISION

Aurotech, Inc., (Aurotech) of Silver Spring, Maryland, protests the establishment of
a blanket purchase agreement (BPA) and issuance of a task order to Discover
Technologies LLC (Discover Tech) of Reston, Virginia, under request for quotations
(RFQ) No. FDA-1 6-RFQ-1 151397, issued by the Department of Health and Human
Services, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for information technology support
services. Aurotech contends that the FDA evaluated vendors' quotations disparately
and contrary to the terms of the solicitation, and challenges the agency's best-value
determination.

We deny the protest.

BACKGROUND

The RFQ was issued on May 26, 2016, to eight small business vendors holding
contracts under General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) 70,
Category 132-51, Information Technology Professional Services. Agency Report (AR),
Tabs 3A-B, RFQ Email & Cover Page; Contracting Officer's Statement (COS) 1. The