About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


B-414086.3 1 (2017-05-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtkj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: GAOU.S. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE 441 G St. N.W. Comptroller General Washington, DC 20548 of the United States ....................................................................................................................... DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE The decision issued on the date below was subject to Decision a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been approved for public release. Matter of: Alphaport Inc.--Reconsideration File: B-414086.3 Date: May 23, 2017 Bradley D. Wine, Esq., Tina D. Reynolds, Esq., Steven W. Cave, Esq., and Sandeep N. Nandivada, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, for the protester. Edward T. DeLisle, Esq., Jacqueline J. Ryan, Esq., Maria L. Panichelli, Esq., and Carl J. Vernetti, Esq., Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman PC, for Banner Quality Management, Inc., an intervenor. Richard J. McCarthy, Esq., Macallister A. West, Esq., and Oliver J. Dunford, Esq., National Aeronautics and Space Administration, for the agency. Nora K. Adkins, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision. DIGEST Request for reconsideration is denied where the requesting party has not shown that our decision contains either errors of fact or law that warrant reversal or modification of the decision. DECISION Alphaport, Inc., of Cleveland, Ohio, requests that we reconsider our decision in Alphaport, Inc., B-414086, B-414086.2, Feb. 10, 2017, 2017 CPD 69, in which we denied Alphaport's protest challenging the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) award of a contract to Banner Quality Management, Inc. (Banner), of Ellicott City, Maryland pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. NNC16ZNA009R for technical support services. Alphaport argues that our decision contained errors of law that warrant reconsideration of our decision. We deny the request for reconsideration. BACKGROUND The RFP was issued on March 24, 2016, under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) part 15 and set aside for woman-owned small businesses. RFP at 00423, 00645. The solicitation contemplated the award of a single cost-plus-fixed-fee contract, with a