About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-413731.2 1 (2017-04-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadtin0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
         De     is ion                               been approved for public release.



         Matter of: A-P-T Research, Inc.

         File:        B-413731.2

         Date:        April 3, 2017

         J. Dale Gipson, Esq., Tracy A. Marion, Esq., and Katherine E. McGuire, Esq.,
         Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne PC, for the protester.
         Jonathan T. Williams, Esq., Patrick T. Rothwell, Esq., Julia Di Vito, Esq., and
         Ambika J. Biggs, Esq., Piliero Mazza PLLC, for Alphaport, Inc., the intervenor.
         Brian M. Stanford, Esq., Victoria H. Kauffman, Esq., and Tracy Lee Belford, Esq.,
         National Aeronautics and Space Administration, for the agency.
         Paul N. Wengert, Esq., and Tania Calhoun, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest that agency misevaluated awardee's proposal under the mission
         suitability factor and the cost realism assessment is sustained where non-incumbent
         awardee proposed high retention rate for incumbent employees, agency determined
         that awardee's proposed professional compensation was at low end of the
         experience and compensation scales used for evaluation, and contemporaneous
         record lacked a reasoned basis for finding awardee's professional compensation or
         proposed costs to be acceptable or realistic.

         2. Protest that agency failed to reasonably analyze a potential impaired objectivity
         organizational conflict of interest (OCI) posed by the awardee's major
         subcontractor, and the awardee's proposed OCI mitigation plan, is sustained where
         the contemporaneous record reflected only pre-solicitation analysis of the potential
         for OCIs, and lacked any documentation to support the agency's argument that the
         evaluation of proposals had assessed the OCI and found the awardee's proposed
         mitigation plan to be sufficient.
         DECISION

         A-P-T Research, Inc., of Huntsville, Alabama, a small business, protests the award
         of a contract to Alphaport, Inc., of Cleveland, Ohio, also a small business, under
         request for proposals (RFP) No. NNK1 6567219R, issued by the National
         Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), for various support services.