About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-412187.2 1 (2017-04-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadthg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                    Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States  Governm ent Accountability  Office         ........................................................................................................................
Washington, DC 20548                                   DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                     The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
         D  e c is  io n                            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.



         Matter of:   Department of Veterans Affairs--Reconsideration

         File:        B-412187.2

         Date:        April 4, 2017

         John W. Tangalos, Esq., Frank V. DiNicola, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs,
         for the agency.
         Bradley D. Wine, Esq., Pablo A. Nichols, Esq., and Sandeep Nandivada, Esq.,
         Morrison & Foerster LLP, for ASM Research, the protester.
         Rand L. Allen, Esq., Kara M. Sacilotto, Esq., Brian G. Walsh, Esq., and George E.
         Petel, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, for Booz Allen Hamilton, the intervenor.
         Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Laura Eyester, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Agency's request for reconsideration of a decision sustaining a protest that the
         agency failed to meaningfully consider potential conflicts of interest arising from the
         awardee's performance of two task orders is denied where the request does not
         demonstrate that the decision contained errors of fact or law that warrant reversal or
         modification of the decision.
         DECISION

         The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) requests that we reconsider our decision
         in ASM Research, B-412187, Jan. 7, 2016, 2016 CPD     38, in which we sustained
         the protest filed by ASM Research, of Fairfax, Virginia, which challenged the VA's
         issuance of a task order to Booz Allen Hamilton, of McLean, Virginia, under request
         for task execution plans (RTEP) No. T4-0671, for operation and maintenance
         support of computer cloud environments. The VA argues that our decision, which
         concluded that the agency failed to meaningfully consider whether the award to
         Booz Allen was tainted by organizational conflicts of interest (OCI), contained errors
         of law and fact that warrant reconsideration of our decision.


We deny the request for reconsideration.