About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-411842.5 1 (2016-11-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadssb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




        G     A    O                                                  Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of: Alliant SB CTA, LLC--Costs

         File:        B-411842.5

         Date:     November 4, 2016

         Joseph L. Fuller, Esq., Stephen M. Sorett, Esq., Nicole P. Moriarty, Esq., L. Elise
         Dieterich, Esq., and Brittney R. McClain, Esq., Kutak Rock LLP, for the protester.
         Scott F. McCleary, Esq., General Services Administration, Information Technology
         Service, for the agency.
         Eric M. Ransom, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protester's request for a recommendation that it be reimbursed its costs for filing
         and pursing its protest is denied where agency took prompt corrective action in
         response to supplemental protest, and the initial protest was not clearly meritorious.
         DECISION

         Alliant SB CTA, LLC (ASC), of Omaha, Nebraska, requests that we recommend that
         it be reimbursed the costs associated with filing and pursuing its protests against
         the decision of the General Services Administration (GSA), Information Technology
         Service, to exclude ASC from the competitive range under request for proposals
         (RFP) No. ID05140054, issued under the GSA's Alliant Small Business Government
         Wide Acquisition Contract, for information technology support for the Department of
         Agriculture's National Information Technology Center.

         We deny the request.

         BACKGROUND

         The GSA issued the solicitation on December 19, 2014, seeking proposals for the
         performance of a single-award task order for one base year and four 1-year option
         periods, to provide a wide range of information technology support services to the
         National Information Technology Center. After evaluation of initial proposals, the
         agency rated the majority of initial proposals--including ASC's initial proposal--
         technically unacceptable. The agency then elected to establish a competitive range