About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-411752.2 1 (2016-10-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadspi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




SG              A    O                                                  Comptroller General
.Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                               of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548



           Decision


           Matter of:  Aldevra--Reconsideration

           File:       B-411752.2

           Date:       October 5, 2016

           Rodney Marshall, Aldevra, for the protester.
           Capt. Matthew A. Freeman, and Scott N. Flesch, Esq., Department of the Army,
           and John W. Klein, Esq., and Sam Q. Le, Esq., Small Business Administration,
           for the agencies.
           Matthew T. Crosby, Esq., and Christina Sklarew, Esq., Office of the General
           Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           Request for reconsideration of a decision denying a protest is dismissed where the
           request is based on the holding in a United States Supreme Court decision issued
           eight months after the protest decision and the Supreme Court decision establishes
           that the holding is prospective only in effect.
           DECISION

           Aldevra, of Portage, Michigan, requests reconsideration of our decision in Aldevra,
           B-411752, Oct. 16, 2015, 2015 CPD T 339, in which we denied the firm's protest
           of the terms of request for quotations No. 999313, issued by the Department of the
           Army, National Guard Bureau, Kansas Air National Guard, for an ice machine/water
           dispenser.

           We dismiss the request.

           BACKGROUND

           The agency issued the solicitation for the ice machine/water dispenser on June 29,
           2015, pursuant to Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) procedures set forth in Federal
           Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 8.4. The procurement was valued at
           approximately $4300. The solicitation was not issued as a small business
           set-aside. Before the solicitation closed, Aldevra, which holds an FSS contract, filed
           a protest with our Office arguing that the agency's decision not to issue the
           solicitation as a set-aside was improper.