About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-413033,B-413033.2 1 (2016-08-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadsme0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                    Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                           of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                 The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                     a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
                                                     been approved for public release.
         D e c i s i o n                           - .-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . ..


         Matter of:   ADNET Systems, Inc.

         File:        B-413033; B-413033.2

         Date:        August 3, 2016

         Eric J. Marcotte, Esq., Kelly E. Buroker, Esq., Jacob W. Scott, Esq., and Kyle E.
         Gilbertson, Esq., Vedder Price, P.C., for the protester.
         Jerry A. Miles, Esq., Angeline R. Burke, Esq., Christine Funk, Esq., and Ann
         Mayhew Golski, Esq., Deale Services, LLC, for Science Systems and Applications,
         Inc., an intervenor.
         Michael I. Mark, Esq., and Alexander T. Bakos, Esq., National Aeronautics and
         Space Administration, for the agency.
         Nora K. Adkins, Esq., and Noah B. Bleicher, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Protest challenging the agency's evaluation of proposals under the solicitation's
         mission suitability factor is denied where the record shows that the agency fully
         considered the proposals, reasonably assigned weaknesses where warranted, and
         did not treat offerors disparately.

         2. Protest challenging the agency's past performance evaluation is denied where
         the evaluation was reasonable and the source selection authority was properly
         briefed on the findings.

         3. Protest challenging the agency's cost realism analysis is denied where the
         agency thoroughly evaluated the proposed costs and reasonably concluded that the
         costs were realistic and that no cost adjustments were required.

         4. Protest of the agency's best-value determination is denied where the decision
         was adequately documented, consistent with the solicitation's evaluation criteria,
         and otherwise unobjectionable.
         DECISION

         ADNET Systems, Inc., a small business of Bethesda, Maryland, protests the award
         of a contract by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to