About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


B-158961 1 (1966-07-05)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadrqx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: <C i. .73 Piey & Rogers Attrnes at Law' tb amt Street, Suite 6o Attntin:Willi=m D. 1iaorc, esquire ference ls made to your letter of Sure 13,,966,4 wita arclaoure, -ating reconsideration of onr decilsion dated fty1, 96 B59 tih atf trmed the rior action taken in disaflowtnk 'thdie laim Of Tn your letter requesting revoew yw state that with respect to the significant faets concerning this matter, our recent letter is tnc lete in Wc regards, and Incorrect :Ui others You enclose a o of letter of October 20, 1965, which ycu allege clawly A forth background wAd circumstarnes involved in this mtter. You tate that the potponetnt of the starting date until Jiame 30 was ntinly for the ovenience of the Governwnt and at the speoial request of ajor Robinson vho stated that this was the date he wiud be able to 4sve the area free for vrt. You further state that not only wre the zrmiaee unavailable or Jure 30, but no special efforts were made by the ovenrment to =ne 'them available by July 1, and, therefore, the Govern- nt breached the cotract. letter of October 20, 1965, wa part of the record %rpon ih our decision of May 19, 1966, was based. The facts of record a tharoughly and caefully considered in our decision and it was cci uiled that the delay vas not so unreaoble as to constitute a breach t the contract. Sice you have furnished no nev material facts or evi- dac not already considered in connection tith the claim, our previous decsioUtich sustalned the disallowance of claini is aff irmed. Very truly yvrs, FTANK H, WLITZEL Cotetrofler tenerea off the lfrdtod States