About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-408112.3 1 (2014-05-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqhj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




        G     A    O                                                 Comptroller General
      Accountabilty * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



         Decision


         Matter of:  National Aeronautics and Space Administration--Reconsideration

         File:       B-408112.3

         Date:       May 14, 2014

         James T. Mahoney, Esq., Richard J. McCarthy, Esq., Tiffany N. Armstrong, Esq.,
         and Warnecke Miller, Esq., National Aeronautics and Space Administration, for the
         agency.
         Scott Arnold, Esq., Justin A. Chiarodo, Esq., Joseph R. Berger, Esq., Christian N.
         Curran, Esq., and Matthew W. Turetzky, Esq., Dickstein Shapiro LLP; and Lee P.
         Curtis, Esq., Jeffrey N. Eisenstein, Esq., Donald J. Carney, Esq., and William J.
         Bainbridge, Esq., Perkins Coie LLP, for Wyle Laboratories, Inc., the protester.
         James J. McCullough, Esq., Jerald S. Howe, Jr., Esq., Michael J. Anstett, Esq.,
         Aaron T. Tucker, Esq., and Samuel W. Jack, Esq., Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &
         Jacobson LLP, for Science Applications International Corporation, the intervenor.
         Eric M. Ransom, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Request for reconsideration is denied where the agency reiterates arguments made
         previously, expresses disagreement with the prior decision, and fails to show that
         our prior decision contains errors of fact or law, or present information not
         previously considered, that would warrant reversal or modification of the prior
         decision.
         DECISION

         The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) requests
         reconsideration of our decision in Wyle Laboratories, Inc., B-408112.2, Dec. 27,
         2013, 2014 CPD T 16, in which we sustained the protest of Wyle Laboratories
         against NASA's award of a contract to Science Applications International
         Corporation (SAIC), pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. NNJ12399614R,
         for medical, biomedical, and health services supporting NASA's human spaceflight
         programs. NASA asserts that our earlier decision was incorrect as a matter of fact
         and law, and should now be reversed.


We deny the request for reconsideration.