About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-408124.3,B-408124.4 1 (2013-12-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadqej0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




         G    A    O                                                   Comptroller General
     Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office  DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548
                                                    The decision issued on the date below was subject to
                                                    a GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has
         Decision                                  [e         for pic release.



         Matter of:   6K Systems, Inc.--Protest and Costs

         File:        B-408124.3, B-408124.4

         Date:        December 9, 2013

         Alex E. Colon, Esq., Law Offices of Alex Colon, for the protester.
         Jacqueline Posner, Esq., Office of Personnel Management, for the agency.
         Cherie J. Owen, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         1. Agency's evaluation of price is unreasonable where it failed to provide a
         reasonable basis for comparing the relative prices of offerors' competing proposals.

         2. Protest that the agency failed to engage in meaningful discussions is sustained
         where the record shows that, although the agency held discussions, those
         discussions did not address a deficiency that was present in both the protester's
         initial and revised proposals.
         DECISION

         6K Systems, Inc., of Leesburg, Virginia, protests the selection of Powertrain, Inc., of
         Landover, Maryland, for establishment of a blanket purchase agreement (BPA)
         under request for proposals (RFP) No. OPM2613R0002, issued by the Office of
         Personnel Management (OPM) for knowledge portal services. 6K contends that the
         agency's price evaluations were flawed and failed to comply with the RFP's
         requirements. 6K also contends that the agency failed to hold meaningful
         discussions during this procurement. In addition, 6K requests that we recommend
         that it be reimbursed its protest costs associated with its earlier challenge to this
         procurement.

         We sustain the current protest and we recommend that 6K be reimbursed the costs
         of filing and pursuing its prior protest.