About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-407124 1 (2012-11-07)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadpdh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




'         G    A    O                                                  Comptroller General
r       Accountablity * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter of: Alares, LLC

          File:        B-407124

          Date:     November 7, 2012

          Donald Maggioli for the protester.
          Jeanne S. Morris, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
          Pedro E. Briones, Esq., and Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest of agency's evaluation of protester's proposal is denied where the proposal
          failed to address compliance with infection control procedures and provide a
          construction safety plan, as required by the solicitation, and agency was not
          required to infer or piece together such information from the protester's past
          performance information.
          DECISION

          Alares, LLC, of Quincy, Massachusetts, protests the award of a contract to Ironclad
          Services, Inc., of Springfield, Massachusetts, under request for proposals (RFP)
          No. VA241-12-R-0714, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for
          replacement of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units. Alares
          challenges the agency's evaluation of its proposal.

          We deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          The RFP, issued as a set-aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small
          businesses, provided for the award of a fixed-price contract to replace two HVAC
          units at the VA Medical Center (VAMC) in Providence, Rhode Island. RFP at 1, 15.
          Offerors were informed that award would be made, without conducting discussions,
          on a best-value basis considering the following factors: management approach,
          past performance, and price. Id. at 16. The management approach and past
          performance evaluation factors, when combined, were significantly more important
          than price. Id. The RFP identified the following five, equally-weighted subfactors