About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-404618.2 1 (2012-04-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadosl0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




   AL     G    A    O0                                                 Comptroller General
21N     Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                        of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548



           Decision


           Matter of: Al Procurement, JVG--Costs

           File:       B-404618.2

           Date:       April 4, 2012

           Derrick Storms, Esq., for the protester.
           Tracy Downing, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
           Paula J. Haurilesko, Esq., and Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General
           Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           Where GAO has recommended the reimbursement of protest costs, the appropriate
           rate for reimbursement of time incurred pursuing the protest by the protester's chief
           executive officer (CEO), who is also an attorney, should be based upon the CEO's
           salary and not a billing rate for outside legal counsel.
           DECISION

           Al Procurement, JVG, of Miami, Florida, requests that our Office determine the rate
           at which the protester can be reimbursed for the time incurred by the protester's
           chief executive officer (CEO), Mr. Storms, who is also an attorney, in pursuing its
           protest in Al Procurement, JVG, B-404618, Mar. 14, 2011, 2011 CPD T 53.

           With respect to the underlying protest, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
           issued request for proposals (RFP) No. VA-786-10-RP-0329 as a set-aside for
           service-disabled, veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) concerns for ground
           maintenance services at the Golden Gate National Cemetery in San Bruno,
           California. Al Procurement, JVG, a joint venture between Al Procurement, LLC,
           and Greencarpet Landscaping & Maintenance, Inc., submitted a proposal. The VA
           rejected the joint venture's proposal because its proposed price was significantly
           below the government cost estimate and the prices of the other offerors.