About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-198004 1 (1980-03-12)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadopl0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                                 RELEASED                                 376

  states General Accounting Office                         Office of
  Vshington, DC 20548                                      GeneralCcunsel
                                                           In Reply
                                                           Refer to; B-19 8004



    Champion Instxunt Laboratory, Inc.                               _ 12 1I*
    P.O. Box 3381
    3630 Spencer Highway
    pasadena, Texas 77502

         Attention: *                ,Jr.
                      President

     Genln:

         We acknowledge your letter of February 29, 1980, expressing
1    concern over the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) develop-
     ment of an in-house capability for instmuent and equipment calibra-
     tion. We are not familiar with this particular program but offer
     the following general information regarding such efforts.

          It is the policy of the Federal Government to rely on private
     enterprise for its needs unless the national interest requires other-
     wise. Against this policy, however, nrst be balanced the various
     public interests in efficient Goverinrt, support of the small
     business sector, etc. Under the provisions of Office of Managerent
     and Budget Circular No. A-76, the decision whether to contract with
     the private sector for services or products in lieu of in-house
     performance depends largely on a comparison of the costs of these
     t70 options. The cost of contracting out is determined by the
     responses of potential contractors to a solicitation for the services
     in question; the cost of Government perfor,=ce is estimated based
     on criteria set by the deparment concerned. Essentially, if the
     evaluation shows the cost of contractor performance to be lower
     than the cost of in-house performnce, then a contract my be awarded
     to lowest-cost offeror; conversely, if the evaluation shcas the cost
     of contractor performance to be higher, then no czmtract is awarded
     and the in-house capability to perform is either developed or con-
     tinued, as the situation requires. The quality of the services
     obtained is, of course, also a consideration.

          We recognize that these programs have not been without problems.
     See, e.g., Development of a National Make-or-3uv Strategy--Proqress
     and Problems, Report to the Congress by the Ccrptroller General,
     PSAD 78-118, September 25, 1978, a copy of which wa have enclosed for







 is



 L                                                         ..