About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-191766 1 (1978-06-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadjaf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
     I                I               U


                     /1)
              leol 5
                             r THE COMPTNLLEN U         -  , L
        ECIUHON      ...        OP THE UNITED               E U
                               .WASHINGaTON. 0.. r_4U



       FILE:   8-191766               OATE: jme 6, 29T8
       MArrE    OF:   Fire A Technical Equipment Carp.

       DIGEST:


          1. Protester's allegations, without evidence
              'Sufficient to affirmatively support its
              poaition (small business subcontracting
              to large busin,,es violates 100-percent
              small busineos set-aside), are speculative
              and, therefore, protester has not met
              burden of proof. In any event, review of
              record discloses (1) that subcontracting,
              if occurring, represents minor portion
              of work and (2) no evidence to show con-
              tractor will not make significant con-
              tribution to manufacture or production
              of end item. Therefore, protest is denied.

          2. It is !ot GAO practice, pureuant to bid
              protest function, to conduct investigations
              for purpose of establishing validity of pro-
              tester's speculative statezents,


              Fire & Technical Equipment Corp. (Fire-Tec) has
          protested the award of a contract, No. N62472-78-C-1609,
          to Gibson Motor and Machine Service, Inc. (Gibson),
          under invitation for bids (IFE) No. N62472-78-B-1609,
          issued as P 100-percent small business set-aside by
          the Naval Fanilities Zngineering Command (Navy) for
          various firefighting equipment.
               Fire-Tec contends that Gibibn is allegedly purchas-
          ing the Twin Agent Firefighting Unit (Twin Agent), which
          is mountedon the truck chassis with other components,
          from a largebusinese in violation.of the terms of the
          IFE. Fire-Tec, in suprort of its contention, indicates
          that IFl paragraph C.9 (Noti-e of Total Small Business
          Set-Aside (1972 Jul) (ASPR S 1-706.5(c)), subparagraph Ob,
          states that the manufacturer or regular dealer must
          agree to furnish end items manufactured or produced by
          small business concerns. Then, Fire-Tec, while admitting
          that qit is not possible * * * to provide all end items






-4                                      I