About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-292911 1 (2003-12-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadiwe0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

 &     ,  G     A    0                                                 Comptroller General
.       Accountability * Integrity Reliability                         of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548



           Decision


           Matter of: 3K Office Furniture Distribution GmbH

           File:       B-292911

           Date:       December 18, 2003

           John Kester for the protester.
           Charles W. MacDonald, Esq., and Capt. AnTroy M. Murphy, Department of the Air
           Force, for the agency.
           Jennifer D. Westfall-McGrail, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the
           General Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
           DIGEST

           Where request for quotations for office furniture required vendors to submit wood
           samples to demonstrate compliance with solicitation requirements pertaining to
           wood quality, agency reasonably rejected protester's quotation, which did not
           include a wood sample, as unacceptable.
           DECISION

           3K Office Furniture Distribution GmbH protests the rejection of its quotation and the
           issuance of a purchase order to ENT GmbH under request for quotations (RFQ)
           No. 61517-03-T-0201, issued by the Department of the Air Force for office furniture
           for a recently renovated building at Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany.

           We deny the protest.

           The RFQ, which was issued on April 13, 2003, sought modular office furniture,
           including desks and desk extensions, chairs, cupboards, shelf systems, mobile
           pedestals, couches, and coffee tables. The solicitation contained highly detailed
           descriptions of the items sought and provided for issuance of an order to the vendor
           whose quotation was most advantageous to the Government, price and other
           factors considered. The RFQ defined other factors as follows:

                 Technically acceptable in accordance with the line item description:
                 Must meet or exceed requested quality (to be evaluated based on
                 descriptive literature and a sample of wood quality provided by