About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-118370 1 (1979-06-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadhiz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








DECISION





FILE:  B-118370

MATTER   OF:


DIGEST:


  CLE         0    TR0LLE
~      0 OF  UIN Tt.CED STATES
       WASHINGTON, ED.C. 265,4B


/4./ -,


DATE:   June 29, 1979


Administrative costs limitation; Pittman-
Robertson, Dingell-Johnson Acts


The 3 percent dministrative pverhead and indirect
cost limitationsof the Pittmart-Robertson aid Dingell-
Jbhns5n Acts] 16 U.S. C. 55 669e(c) and 777e
(c) respectively, apply to costs incurred by an
agency or department--a central service activity--
of the State whose functions include regularly per-
forming services not for its own constitutent ele -
ments but all agencies of the State. Therefore, they
do not apply to costs incurred by the Colorado De-
partment of Natural Resources (DNR) in providing
services to its Division of Wildlife even though the
Qlivision may exercise control over its programs,
since for administrative purposes it is a part of
DNR  and any services provided by DNR to it are
of an intra-departmental nature.


   This decision is in response to- a request from the Deputy Solicitor,
Department of the Interior for an & terpretation of two laws prescribing
a limitation on overhead or i rdired costs assessed&forState-central
services to grattee agencies. His letter describes the problem as
follows:

       We would appreciate your advice on the interpretation
   of a provision of concern to this Department's Fish and
   Wildlife Service (FWS) Federal Aid program, under the
   Pittman-Robertson  and'Dingell-Johnson Acts, 16 U. S. C.
   § 669 et seq. and § 777 et seq., respectively. Section
   6(c) of the Pittman-Robertson Act, 16 U. S. C. § 669e(c),
   provides:  [footnote omitted]

           'Administrative costs in the form or over-
           head or indirect costs for services provided
           by State central service activities outside of
           the State agency having primary jurisdiction
           over the wildlife resources of the State which
           may be charged against programs or projects
           supported by the fund established by Section
           669b of this title shall not exceed in any one
           fiscal year 3 per centum-of the annual appor-
           tionment to the State. [Emphasis added. ]