About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-192985 1 (1979-01-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadgvt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                        THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECIION . 2§C. OF THE UNITED STATES
                        WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548


3 IU~.


FILE: B-192985


MATTER  OF:


DATE: January 25, 1979


GTE Sylvania Incorporated


     DIGEST:                          6

     1.   GAO declines to consider issues directly
          related to default termination, including
          alleged impossibility of specifications,
so ,  /4/ because they are before contract appeals
      V A~board.  Protester may not collaterally
          attack or argue same issues in two forums.


   2.   Even though issues related to default
        termination are before contract appeals
        board, GAO will consider whether reprocure-
        ment was preoerly condlictdL

   3.   When defaulted contractor has stated
        that it cannot meet specifications which
        procuring agency considers essential, no
        useful purpose would be served by soliciting
        that contractor for reprocurement to same
        specifications.

   4.   Award of reprocurement contract to second-low
        bidder on original solicitation is recognized (?
        method of reprocurement, particularly when
        award is made at that bidder's price.

        GTE Sylvania Incorporated (GTE), whose contract
   to supply-the Federal-Aviation Administration (FAA)##CddC
   with lamps to be used along airport runways was termi-
   nated for default, has protested the agency's award
   of a reprocurement contract to General Electric Company
   (GE).                              e-A

        GTE alleqes that the reprocurement contract, like
   the terminated one, contains specifications which are
   ipasib.le-t-a--mee-t-. GTE furEer alleges that the
   reprocurement was improperly made on a sole source
   basis and that the sp-eTTT-aflons in uestion hve
   been waiyed.f.o.rGE. Even if GE is meeting the specifi-
   cations, GTE argues, they exceed the FAA'sminimum
   needs and therefore unduly restrict competition.




1Tt~ossil LE TO (n2EE7Q_


/


eLj