About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-190929 1 (1978-03-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadftj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





                                               John A. Carter
                       ,~ %                                 FL 1
                    DE O   s - . TMF COMPTfOLI.ER GENERAL
            DEC1810riCF TME LIPJITEC3 STATES
                              WAIHINGTN. D. C. 204


              B-190929
      FILE:                         DATE:  March 3, 1978

      MATTER  OF:   Consolidated Ele.ivator Comoany

      DIGEST:
                  Neither possibility of a buy-r. nor
                  allegation of excessively low bid pro-
                  vides a basis upon which award of con-
                  tract may be challenged. RejecLion
                  of bid for too low price requires a
                  determination of nonresponsibility, and
                  this Office no longer reviews affirmative
                  determination of responsibility absent
                  circumst&nces not present here.

             Consolidated Elevator -Company, Tnc. (Consolidated),
       has protested against allegedly unfair price competition
       in connection with invitation fcr bids (IFB) No. 3-8-19
       issuel by the National Park Service for the procurement
       of elevator maintenance services for the John F. Kennedy
       Center for the Performing Arts.

            Consolidated, a small business, contends that the
       Otis Elevator Company (Otis), a large busineiss, has en-
       gaged in what amounts to predatory pricing fPr the pur-
       pose of eliminating its small business competitors.
       Consolidated alleges that Otis reduced its bid signifi-
       cantly on the present procurement from that bid on earlier
       procurements although the specifications require increased
       operating costs and the costs of material and labor have
       increased.  Consolidated suggests that this is only one
       instance of a developing pattern of Otis significantly
       reducing its charges when faced with competition from
       qualified small businesses. Consolidated asks that Otis
       be disqualified from the present competition on the basis
       of entering a nonresponsible unbalanced bid and that
       award be made to the next lowest responsive btdder.





                              -l1 -








I M M