About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

LOG IN
LOG IN


B-190996 1 (1978-01-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadfqf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: I I THE COMP41TROLLER1 RhVP1% - rmr saresLnamMERAL, DECISION . ;o rmU UNITED sErATES %*'ASMINGTON. 0.0. ROUSE --', FILE. B-3190996 OATE: Jnu-t.7 19# 19T8 MATTER ap: Complete building Xaintenance Co., lac. DIGEST:. Proteat alizaging specification defie:ies filed after bid opening S untimely tad not for consideration under GAO Did Protest Procedures. Ii- Complete Building mintenance Co.s Inc. (CIm) protests W, the award ofa contract un er solicitation No. F33601-77-BE340, issued by wright-Pattersin\ tr Force Dast, Ohio for cus:odial, janitorial and related services, CBM asserts that thr specifications were ambiguous, which made it iumosuible to ascertain the precise scope of work upon which to bid. This allegation relates to a deficianq yin the solicitation. Sectiont 0.2(b)(1) o ur Jid ProteZai Procedures, 4 C.F.R. 8 20.2 ( b)(11977). provides that apotest based upon an alleged improprity tii any ype of 9olicitation, wh.t is apparent prior to-bid opening 6: t losing date for receipt of initial propo- sals, must e filed .'prior to bid opening oi- ' cusing date for receipt of initial proposals. The pr.teuter's letter indicatas that bid opening kas already taken place. Accordingly, the protest is untimely and not for consideration on the merits. Pau1 C. Demb taug Cmneral Courn1l 1-1 lies I J I 4 C * I