About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-180010.05 1 (1976-01-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddti0001 and id is 1 raw text is:                      I IR
                             THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION 7.  J   OF THE UNITED STATES
                          :  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548

                                                    03&


DATE:   January 2, 1976


FILE:   B-180010.05

MATTER OF: Kel
                set


ly Air Force Base back pay - pre-arbitration
tlement agreement


1.  The Back Pay Act of 1966, 5 U.S.C.
    5596, requires, among other things,
    a determination that there has been
    an unjustified and unwarranted per-
    sonnel action before an award of
    back pay under that Act may be made.
    Assuming a determination has been,
    or is, made by the appropriate
    authority in this instance that
    there has been an unjustified or
    unwarranted personnel action on
    the part of management, an award
    of back pay may be made under the
    above-mentioned statute.


               2.  Whether employees should be paid over-
                   time under Provisions of a collective
                   bargaining agree:ent cannot be determined
                   by the Comptroller General since this
                   is a matter that would best be decided
                   by an arbitrator after hearing evidence
                   and arguments from the parties involved.

     This matter involves a requebt for an advance decision from
the Commander, Kelly Air Force Base, Texas, as to whether the
Comptroller General will authorize payments of back pay pursuant
to a pre-arbitration settlement agreement.

     Briefly stated, the facts in the case are as follows. The
normal workweek in the 433rd Tactical Air Wing (TAW) at Kelly Air
Force Base, Texas, is five 8-hour days, Monday through Friday. In
February 1975, the workweek was altered by the Activity (manage-
ment) so that 30 TA employees worked during the weekend of
February 22-23. Rather  than pay overtime for this necessary
weekend support, it was the decision of management that the 30
TAW employees involved not work an equivalent number of days
during the normal workweek. This requirement to work was generated


3


LIG :  I: