About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-184988 1 (1976-01-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaddrq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                          -, THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 DECISION        .           OF   THE    UNITED       STATES
                              WASHINGTON, D. C. 20548




 FILE:     B-184988                 DATE:  January 29, 1976

 MATTER   OF:      Sunroc Corporation


 DIGEST:

 1. Failure to indicate in bid whether bidder was owned or
    controlled by a parent corporation is a minor informality
    which is waivable under FPR § 1-2.405 and does not render
    bid nonresponsive.

2.  Failure to complete and submit with bid form providing
    information regarding bidder status as small business
    surplus labor area concern is waivable under FPR § 1-2.405
    as requirement does not concern bid responsiveness but
    rather order of priority in negotiations with small
    business bidders; moreover, information was provided elsewhere
    in bid.

3.  Protest must be considered as timely where facts indicate
    probability that protest was received timely by contracting
    activity.


    The  Sunroc Corporation (Sunroc) protests any award to the Elkay
Manufacturing Company (Elkay) under the small business set-aside
portion of General Services Administration (GSA) invitation for bids
No. FPGA-FH-55613-A-7-16-75. Award is being withheld pending our
decision.

     We must first consider the argument of Elkay's counsel that
the protest is untimely under our Bid Protest Procedures since bid
opening was July 16, 1975, and because the protest letter was dated
July 24, it obviously was received by GSA at a later date, a period
of more than 5 days after the matters protested became public know-
ledge.  Our Bid Protest Procedures, however, in effect at the time
of bid opening (40 Fed. Reg. 17979 (1975)) allow a period of up to
10 working days after the basis of the protest becomes known in
which to file the protest. Since July 24 was only 6 working days
after bid opening, and since GSA has not indicated that the protest
was untimely received we must presume that the protest was received
by GSA in a timely fashion. Consequently, we will consider the
merits of the protest.


- 1 -