About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-184916 1 (1975-10-10)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcus0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                             THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
D ECS 10N                    OF   THE UNITED STATES
                             SASH   IN GTON, D.C. 20548




FILE:        B-184916              DATE: October 10, 1975

MATTER OF:        Meldick Services, Inc.


DIGEST:

           Protest alleging that agency's cost comparison
           utilized to support determination to retain food
           service operation in-house rather than contracting
           with commercial source was improper is not for con-
           sideration, since applicable provisions of 0MB Cir-
           cular A-76 are regarded as a matter of Executive policy
           which do not establish legal rights and respon-
           sibilities and which are not within GAO decision
           functions.


     Meldick Services, Inc. (Meldick), has protested the decision by
the Department of the Air Force to retain the food service operation
at Andrews Air Force Base in-house rather than contracting with it.

     Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-76 and Depart-
ment of Defense (DOD) implementing directives (DOD Instruction 4100.33,
Air Force Regulation 26-12) express a general policy preference for
contracting with private, commercial enterprises as opposed to the
Government's performing the required services in-house. However, the
Circular provides specific circumstances under which the Government
may provide a commercial service for its own use, one of which is
where procurement of the service from a commercial source will result
in higher cost to the Government. OMB Circular A-76 para. 5e. The
Air Force, after analyzing the comparative cost, found that retaining
the food service in-house would be more economical than contracting
with Meldick.  However, M1eldick alleges that the cost analysis over-
stated the contract costs and understated the in-house costs. In
that connection, in 53 Comp. Gen. 86, 88 (1973), it was stated:

     * * * we have always regarded the provisions of Circular
     A-76 as matters of Executive policy which do not establish
     legal rights and responsibilities and which are not within
     the decision functions of the General Accounting Office. * * *


- 1 -