About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-404919 1 (2011-06-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbvm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   Ii
   .L

 A       GA        O                                                  Comptroller General
f. A    Accountabity * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548

              D   ..
          Decision


          Matter  of:  ALOPS

          File:        B-404919

          Date:        June 21, 2011

          Anis Chlela for the protester.
          Maj. C. Peter Dungan, Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Susan  K. McAuliffe, Esq., and Edward Goldstein, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest challenging agency's rejection of proposal as technically unacceptable is
          denied where agency's evaluation was reasonable and consistent with solicitation
          terms.
          DECISION

          ALOPS,  of Kandahar, Afghanistan, protests the award of a contract to Gulf Supplies
          &  Commercial Services (GSCS), of Kabul, Afghanistan, under request for proposals
          (RFP)  No. W91B4N-1 1-R-8016 issued by the Department of the Army for the
          construction of residential concrete huts (b-huts) at Bagram Air Field, Afghanistan.
          ALOPS   challenges the agency's rejection of its proposal as technically unacceptable,
          arguing that the underlying evaluation was unreasonable and inconsistent with the
          terms of the solicitation.

          We  deny the protest.

          The RFP, issued on January 19, 2011, contemplated the award of an
          indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract to the offeror that submitted the
          lowest-priced, technically acceptable proposal in response to the RFP's
          requirements. The RFP  provided that technical proposals would be evaluated for
          technical approach, past performance and price. Under the technical approach
          factor, which was to be evaluated on a pass/fail basis, the RFP identified the
          following six subfactors: (1) mobilization and construction plans; (2) material
          delivery and installation plans; (3) quality control plans; (4) safety plans; (5) badging
          plans; and (6) design, drawings and specifications. Id.