About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-298662 1 (2006-11-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaczqx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


  I

         G    A    0Comptroller General
L LA   Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                    of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548                                DOCUMENT  FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
                                                  The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                  GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                *eiinapproved for public release.
         D  e c i s i o n                        -----------------------------------------------------------


         Matter of:  Advanced Federal Services Corp.

         File:       B-298662

         Date:       November  15, 2006

         Howell Roger Riggs, Jr., Esq., Patrick 0. Miller, Esq., and David H. Stem, Jr., Esq.,
         Dick, Riggs, Miller & Stem, LLP for the protester.
         Ronald K. Henry, Esq., John L. Bowles, Esq., and Kevin S. Donohue, Esq., Kaye
         Scholer, LLP, for Eastek, Inc., an intervenor.
         Jeffrey I. Kessler, Esq. and Janet K. Baker, Esq., Army Materiel Command, for the
         agency.
         Jonathan L. Kang, Esq., and Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest challenging agency's evaluation of offerors' proposals and source selection
         decision is denied where agency's determinations were reasonable and consistent
         with the solicitation.
         DECISION

         Advanced Federal Services Corp. (AFS) protests the award of a contract to
         Eastek, Inc. under request for proposals (RFP) No. W9128Z-06-R-0001, issued by the
         Department of the Army Communications-Electronics Life Cycle Management
         Command   for business administrative support services (BASS). The protester
         contends that the agency unreasonably evaluated offerors' technical proposals and
         past performance and made an improper source selection decision.

         We  deny the protest.

         BACKGROUND

         The RFP sought proposals to provide BASS requirements for the Army Information
         Systems Engineering Command, Army Communications Security Logistics Activity,
         and the Communications-Electronics Life Cycle Management Command Acquisition
         Center Southwest. Offerors were required to propose BASS requirements for these
         facilities, including administrative support, shipping and receiving, logistics, system