About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline



B-296136.2 1 (2005-06-20)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaczcy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


  I

         G    A    0Comptroller General
L MA   Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                    of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548


             D  ..
         Decision


         Matter of:  Advanced Environmental Solutions, Inc.--Costs

         File:       B-296136.2

         Date:       June 20, 2005

         William E. Hughes, III, Esq., Whyte Hirschboeck Dudek S.C., for the protester.
         Michael J. O'Farrell, Jr., Esq., and Major Rebecca R. Vernon, Department of the Air
         Force, for the agency.
         Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., and James A. Spangenberg, Esq., Office of the General
         Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         GAO  will not recommend reimbursement of the costs of protest challenging contract
         award based on improper evaluation of past performance, where protest was
         rendered academic by agency's decision to terminate the contract and make a new
         award decision in response to Small Business Administration's decision that
         awardee was not eligible for award.
         DECISION

         Advanced Environmental Solutions, Inc. (AES) requests that our Office recommend
         that the agency reimburse AES's reasonable costs of filing and pursuing its protest of
         a contract under solicitation No. FA8101-05-R-0003, awarded to Eason Enterprises
         OKC  LLC by the Department of the Air Force to transport and dispose of hazardous
         waste.

         We  deny the request.

         The RFP, which was set aside for service-disabled, veteran-owned small business
         concerns, provided for a best value award, considering price/cost, past
         performance, and mission capability factors. The solicitation specified that the
         agency's source selection decision would be based on a past performance/price
         tradeoff of those offers that were determined to be technically acceptable.

         The Air Force awarded the contract to Eason, and AES protested on March 28, 2005,
         raising challenges to Eason's technical acceptability and the agency's past
         performance and price evaluation. Our Office dismissed all but the past